This is a severe case of the NYT slapping an incendiary headline on a perfectly fine article, clearly just trying to rage-bait people into clicking. Krugman is mostly correct here.
This is a severe case of the NYT slapping an incendiary headline on a perfectly fine article, clearly just trying to rage-bait people into clicking. Krugman is mostly correct here.
Thanks, and also thanks for the image hosting site!
hmmm seems the image didn’t upload. Here’s an imgur link https://imgur.com/a/uCKtlLA
She literally co-sponsored every piece of legislation in the first link.
I see you’ve swallowed a lot of right wing propaganda and hate about her. She’s not perfect, but she’s very bright and energetic and progressive, trying to help protect our the environment and help working class people. That’s enough for me to consider her one of many good potential choices for '28.
I’m curious. Who do you think is a good presidential candidate for '24 or '28?
Have a look yourself:
Here’s the stuff that passed: https://www.congress.gov/member/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/O000172?q={“bill-status”%3A"law"}
Here’s everything she put forward: https://www.congress.gov/member/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/O000172
She’s active and great legislator.
For me Impossible tastes better than beyond. I’m happy to eat either over beef even though I think beef has the potential to be the tastiest.