Why is Lincoln shown? What does the author try to imply?
Down with the enemies of the working class.
Why is Lincoln shown? What does the author try to imply?
Thanks for looking out for me.
The bridge bomber wants to lecture us about terrorism
I bet somebody in the comments is mad that Kiev was spelled in Russian.
Same, all the guys I’ve met are crazy about sports and FIFA games. When I was in high school, I would skip playing football during Phys Ed and watch what the girls were doing instead.
Attacking Iran was absolutely unnecessary
Poland also took part in the partition of Czechoslovakia.
There was a revolt in the Rif when berber tribes decided to cut ties with the royal family and declare independence. Later there was a period of instability called the years of lead where forces were acting to try to overthrow the Moroccan monarchy.
Because Algeria and Libya had revolutions. There were a few attempts in Morocco but they were all defeated by the government of the ruling family which had become friends with the west since the start of the 20th century.
The population is majority muslim, but the government has no problem being Zionist.
It’s not the middle ages anymore. If it means they can share part of the superprofits, the Moroccan government will abandon any principles it had. This is true for other countries such as Saudi Arabia or even other terrorist groups.
A zionist government that collaborated with french occupiers. The biggest obstacle to stability in North Africa and a traitor to the Palestinian cause.
Lol at Morocco being on the red side
Because at that point Germany had signed the treaty with the Soviet Union
I watched one video from him when BayArea was still around and instantly hated him
I spent too much time reading those comments. I have such a deep hatred of western liberals, it’s unreal.