I said I’m no pro and just spitballing, your last line about being a simp is pretty strange.
Be nice or be a loser.
I said I’m no pro and just spitballing, your last line about being a simp is pretty strange.
3 videos a day for 5.5 months (about 167 days). That’s 500 videos. 500 x $25 = $12500, not $1250.
I have no clue if it’s feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn’t matter then It must be doable.
It could be worth it if they can also make money through other companies for the same videos. Plus if they’re popular enough that Amazon is paying them then they must already be making ad revenue or something.
I don’t know. I’m not a pro, just spitballing.
How do you know it’s just a bookshelf?
You’re missing the point entirely 😀
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA Trump knowing how to play checkers hahahahaha
Are there any Lemmy apps that actually let you click and highlight a parent comment and then click on a next button to automatically and instantly scroll to the next apparent level comment? RiF (Reddit is fun) had that feature and I can’t believe I’m not seeing it on either connect for Lemmy or that sync app.
The point is that news about Twitter rebranding is simply not related to technology. This is a technology community. These submissions should not even be posted in the first place to have the opportunity to be voted on.
Thank you for reducing your meat consumption. I know you can go all the way with it.
Knowing everything about my body.
What is my current blood sugar? O2 level electrolyte status? How much shit do I have in my colon?
How do you know it’s the same people?
Maybe it can be emitted from different light sources around your house
"I don’t want to have to write out some long String in terminal to install software. "
I’m no expert, but isn’t it literally just apt get (name of software) to download and install through terminal?
Does lift off have the feature to highlight a comment and then hit a button to go directly to the next parent level comment?
The person who wrote this blog has no brain wrinkles.
Is this 11-hour figure based on driving or some type of train that already exists?
The article says that according to the guy who sued him, he had accepted the terms of a contract through text message.
However, it doesn’t say that according to the guy that sued him, he had accepted a contract specifically through the sending of 👍 in a text message in the past.
The article did not say that he had ever used 👍 previously in text to accept a contract. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he had responded through text message in the past to accept a contract.
Is the article mentioned the criteria for a video? I don’t care enough about it to read the article. Can the video be like one of those YouTube shorts and and still be worth the 25 bucks?