Need to go back to caroling the rich with the underlying threat of disobedience and violence if they don’t pay up.

Ms. Claus is real. Santa is the fake one.

Are you mad he didn’t dispose of the gun and paraphernalia as you instructed him?

Also no anime cosplay '90s GF. Don’t know why we even bother.

Doesn’t even make sense. The mirror image would be something like a misrepresentation of the USSR where the government is presented as over-bearing and bureaucratic but through it people’s economic/work life and social/non-work life were expanded greatly compared to what their lives would be like under capitalist development.

Also, when would they say this inversion took place in liberal society exactly? Also, also, if they’re pointing out that people are resisting an oppressive state them that’s not a mirror image but a 3rd square in their little chart of formally/actually free/unfree.

Formally free / Actually free (communism)
Formally free / Actually unfree (liberalism, as Marx described)
Formally unfree / Actually unfree (fascism?, what imperial society is careening to)
Formally unfree / Actually free (his “mirror”, what I’d say is socialist development?

“Your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular?”

Kamala:

Save face and not freak out investors.

Donda

They probably are categorizing it more by what order they think people should read them and less how complicated they are, per se. The beginner category seems to have more rhetorical value getting people interested in MLism I guess?

Edit: Would put Capitalist Realism in the intro though if that’s the case and the Stalin stuff after it. I don’t know. I can almost tell this is made by a 20-something marxist-leninist who’s probably excited to recommend what other people should read but aren’t particularly well-read themselves.