what? It wasn’t empty. There was, um, something about… hmm I don’t remember.

OP is a high level rouge with a CHA dump stat.

¿porque no los dos?

yes!

uh, why not?

funny how technically the marlboros are the most natural thing of these

On the contrary. They can hide this kind of thing in the numbers. Reporting on egregious individual cases has a chance to heighten awareness.

On a positive note, that kind of claim has been struck down in Canada before.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisagarcia/2024/02/19/what-air-canada-lost-in-remarkable-lying-ai-chatbot-case/

Nah, a democratic nation has to follow its own laws. It looks much better if they revoke it with proof after due process.

did they expect any different? Why would anyone on Greenland be aligned with someone who threatened to invade you?

A few friends of mine used to have a sms-based group chat we used for many years. One of those friends kept losing phones and getting new numbers. At some point one of his older numbers texted something to the tune of “what the fuck is this, why are you texting me?!”. It turns out the old number had been reassigned.

then again, no state secrets were exchanged.

What’s the point of a summary that’s longer than the article itself?

that is not the image you showed.

they’re a type of eagle candy.

looks fine to me, the problem is on your end, or it’s intermittent somehow.

Same, but “kalkon” in swedish.

I felt slightly smug before I learned that haha

so like, close, but no cigar.

That bird Is called Turkey in English
It’s called India (translated) in Turkish, and many European languages
In India it is also named after Turkey
The Arabic word for it translates to East Africa
Malaysians call it Dutch Chicken
In Cambodia its French chicken

And the fucking bird comes from North America

hmm, true enough. But in my mind there’s a clear difference between showing information unedited and referring to its source, and this.

That’s a good point, that muddies the waters a bit. Makes it hard to say wether it’s spouting info from the web or if it’s data from the model.

I can’t comment on actual legality in this case, but I feel handling personal data like this, even from the open web, in a context where hallucinations are an overwhelming possibility, is still morally wrong. I don’t know the GDPR well enough to say wether it covers temporary information like this, but I kinda hope it does.