1 VSSTS = 39.28 FF/CB
c’mon, every god fearin’merican knows that! They teach that in gunday school.
1 VSSTS = 39.28 FF/CB
c’mon, every god fearin’merican knows that! They teach that in gunday school.
Silly @Frog@Lemmy.ca
They forgot that US highway speed units are measured as a ratio of a veyron SS’s top speed. For those that don’t know, that’s 7.37 billion bald eagle wingspans per presidential term.
But it potentially could have damaged the lichens which will totally not be affected by climate change!!! Won’t someone think of the lichens?!
I don’t know, but I’ve been told
Filling the jar is getting old
Oh, huh. That’s interesting. I’m from the great white north, and our gas hookups are copper from what I’ve seen. If this is indeed iron, then the melting point would be higher: ~ 1,540°C.
Interestingly that colour temperature chart is supposedly fairly consistent across different metals.
I think you’re right. I was curious, so I looked it up.
The melting point of copper is 1,085°C, and judging from this chart, its definitely getting close:
While it looks scary as fuck, wouldn’t it not actually explode unless the gas pipe melted through? There’s no oxygen in the fuel, so it can’t combust. I guess as the gas heats up, it’s also possible the for the tank or lines to spring a leak.
Either way, I’d be nopeing out and calling emergency services.
This might work for consumer markets, but they’ve got b2b partners with deep pockets and expensive lawyers that are not happy. Also, the problem is widespread enough that a class action suit would be a pretty big deal. I don’t think this’ll just blow over.
IMO intell is scrambling to solve a hardware problem with software so they don’t have to do a massive and very, very costly recall.
Until they unequivocally show this not to be the, just hang tight.
I think Smith would hate a lot of what’s going on in modern capitalism, TBH.
Shocking. Absolutely shocking, I say. It’s almost like we’ve seen this exact pattern a hundred times before.
Hear me out: inbreeding.
I’d highly recommend hydrus network for that sort of thing. It’s exactly what it’s designed for, and is quite mature but still very actively developed.
Or shot him as well as 2 bystanders and another cop, and then claimed he had a knife, but that it was subsequently stolen.
Boss makes a dollar, I make a dime.
That’s why I use this app to normalize time.
And you can’t out yourself because, in many workplace cultures, the appearance of knowing is more important than actually knowing. :/
Their bones are actually inert. Your bones just want to join their bones doing fuck all all day long. Their bones are doing your bones’ bidding.
I’ve noticed a pattern with this sort of thing, that when people are complicit in systems that they benefit from, they’ll put forward arguments they don’t really believe in because they’re obligated to by their own cognitive dissonance. I was first introduced to a term for this pattern of behavior by PhilosophyTube: a phantasm.
It’s a way of organizing feelings, selective observations and misrepresentations. A way of intepreting the world that also does things to the person using it.
Okay, that’s a bit vague. The video essay goes on to provide some cohesive examples, but if I could try to summarize it:
A phantasm is a self propagating system of incoherent beliefs that a person generates to willingly deceive themselves about their own complicity in systemic oppression of others in order to alleviate cognitive dissonance and maintain the belief that they are a “good” person.
I’ve seen this behavior most notably in alt-right, anti-vax, and conspiracy theorist types, but I’ve also seen it a lot with anti-vegans.
One of the main symptoms of this self deception is to blindly parrot bad arguments that perpetuate their own deception, even when they don’t believe their own arguments are coherent.
I think, sometimes, depending on the severity of the phantasm, this behavior can also be a search for a refutation. Part of them might want to reject the phantasm, and given sufficiently well gounded arguments and/or evidence, some people are capable of rejecting the phantasm.
In any case, I think there’s a lot more going on psychologically than simple willful bad faith. Phantasms are incredibly hard to dislodge when people are emotionally invested in maintaining them, and I don’t have a good answer about the correct approach, or even if there is any sort of generalized right way. It may well be that every single instance requires a unique solution.
That’s some dark souls shit right there.