Notice what?
Notice what?
If I’m Spez, aren’t I just laughing at all the people who are still using my platform to do this? They are still getting ad revenue from all those page visits right?
My favorite part: the Times reported that after a 2004 investigation by The Los Angeles Times came out about his disclosures, he largely stopped disclosing them.
I wish I had the choice in my life to give so FEW fucks that I could be that brazenly corrupt.
Against better counsel huh? You know apple is the sole reason your group chats can’t work without a third party app yeah?
Insert Principal Chalmers it’s not me meme.
By the time this game hits the market it’s target audience will be significantly diminished by having passed away from natural causes.
I’ve been putting my faith in Aliens, but AI is looking more likely lately. Let’s hope.
Yes, of course! An EPIRB!
… what is an EPIRB?
Wonder if phone manufacturers will fragment their offerings to satisfy EU requirements or if we’ll all end up with removable batteries.
Linus is so wrong here.
“I expressed my disappointment that he didn’t go through proper journalistic practices in creating this piece. He has my email and number (along with numerous other members of our team) and could have asked me for context that may have proven to be valuable”
It’s exactly the opposite, by not giving Linus a preview of the material, and allowing him input on it. Steve has secured the journalistic integrity of the content.
Linus had a chance to address the content publicly and is opting not to do it.
“Most of what I have to say, I’ve already said, and I’ve done so privately.”
He clearly thinks we are not worth keeping informed so I’m going to be unsubscribing and no longer consuming any LTT content.
Overall this response sucks. No accountability, plenty of deflection and missing the point. Vague talk of being more accurate in the future, so I’m supposed to just wait and consume inaccurate content in the mean time? No thanks.