![](https://media.kbin.social/media/f2/69/f269ddf30287874aea2f25654a7e4d6cb270f64e87f5f377428ed321f735085f.png)
![](https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/6d72a462-e85e-408a-861f-c16ac6e81d71.png)
You know, I feel like lately every other article in that paper is an advertisement for Quarks
Just some girl from Canada
You know, I feel like lately every other article in that paper is an advertisement for Quarks
Meh, what does that idiot know anyways, this is delicious!
Reminds me of the Why Are You Closed?!? guy
Hahah no, there’s nobody driving the bus
No need for the \s. That is literally how they did this “study”. I’d be interested to see who it was that paid for this bullshit, wouldn’t be surprised to see the money trail leading back to commercial real estate.
The article boasts the headline front and center % productivity loss, as though this was some years long extensive study. The section of the report discussing these results is less than two paragraphs long. I’ve seen high school students put together a more detailed a well researched study.
What bothers me the most is that people will readily reference this article and spread this bullshit everywhere, with basically no one having read the study or put any critical thinking into this at all.
But he looks ever so polite, he must have his cheese!
I’m imagining their lawyer pulling out their wallet at the hearing and thumbing through their singles to pay the fine.
$5k is absolutely nothing for a typical law firm, lunch money
I was using this arrow more when I was driving different vehicles for work. We have two vehicles and each has the tank on the opposite side, so I had just trained myself to use the arrow now. Just something I had gotten used to doing I guess
Don’t feed the trolls.
They don’t care about the topic, they don’t care about the facts or a logical debate. They only care about getting a reaction out of you. Don’t give them what they want.