Recently we’ve been seeing some pretty obvious spam, which I & others have been clearing out, but there’s also been simple link posts to articles that aren’t quite spam yet don’t have any body text to suggest what the intent is. Presumably to start a conversation, but I’d like people’s input here before I make any firm decisions on the matter.

Would you prefer that we require link posts to have some additional body text to better start conversations, or disallow link posts in favor of the relevant links being only in the body text (i.e. what you’re reading now) that more clearly starts & guides the conversation? Or something else?

Let me know in the replies and I’ll adjust the rules accordingly and make a new locked/pinned post to make these changes more apparent.

  • Rhaedas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a big fan either of the drive-by link posts. Most places I’ve been subscribed to elsewhere usually had a rule to make some effort in including a summary or opinion and not a blank text field.