https://archive.is/2CsfM

House Bill 2127, which takes effect on Sept. 1, will do away with local rules that require water breaks for construction workers. The cities of Austin and Dallas, for example, require 10-minute breaks every four hours. San Antonio officials had been considering a similar ordinance.

“We are human beings who need respect,” Martínez said. “We really need to be allowed to work without problems, without any barriers … Believe me, we are dying inside those buildings when they take away our water and our [break] time.”

  • BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t blame our government, it’s the evil company that would take away breaks you should be mad at!

    What kind of asinine logic is this? When has any profit driven corporation ever done “the right thing” without government stipulations? Maybe you should read up on Dupont, Shelll, Exxon, Enron, Rocketdyne, and about a million other companies that did the exact opposite of that as long as they possibly could and even then some.

    • hawkwind@lemmy.management
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure who you are quoting, or trying to reason with, but I agree with your sentiment. A profit driven company will do everything it can to profit. Are you trying to say we should “only” be mad at the government and not the company, in this scenario?

      • VenoraTheBarbarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the person you’re asking but we can be mad at both. Companies are evil, profit driven, employee exploiters. We know this, and we must force them to treat their workers like humans. Failure by the government to force companies to treat their workers like humans is something we should be mad at the government for.

        We want the government to step in BECAUSE we’re mad at the companies and want to change the companies policies.