One of these has definitely hauled more than the other, and i guarantee you it’s not the ford.

  • TDCN@feddit.dkOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I never said I was worked up. I never stated I hated the man or speculating wether or not he has a small pp. That’s irrelevant to me. I just noted that the size difference is comically large, meaning I don’t understand how these cars have any practical means of existing in a dence city where a small family car would do the job driving to work just fine and grocery shopping is literally 100m away. I do agree that the comment section in general is getting pretty heated. That’s also Something funny to me because those geting so angry are no better people.

    • drdiemz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alls I’m saying is your title felt super aggressive and it is funny to me because you picked a ford ranger, of all trucks, to lampoon when its easily the least egregious pickup that is available currently

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not OP but IIRC the F150 is quite larger and wider than the Ranger, or am I wrong…?

        The last time I saw a Ranger it looked similarly sized to a Toyota Hilux

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Ranger, Maverick, F series in order of size. I went looking for a little truck a few years ago and ended up with an Edge since finding trucks that small is actually rather difficult in America