In order to bypass the GDPR, Meta apparently plans to move to a "Pay for your Rights" approach

The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta plans to move to a “Pay for your Rights” model, where EU users will have to pay $ 168 a year (€ 160 a year) if they don’t agree to give up their fundamental right to privacy on platforms such as Instagram and Facebook. History has shown that Meta’s regulator, the Irish DPC, is likely to agree to any way that Meta can bypass the GDPR. However, the company may also be able to use six words from a recent Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling to support its approach.

  • RiQuY@lemm.ee
    11·
    10 个月前

    What I was refering when I said rights is the right to decide whether if they should use my private info or not.

    • BenderOver@artemis.camp
      2·
      10 个月前

      It’s a private website. You give up your rights when accessing the site. If you want to keep your right to your info, don’t use the site…

      • Blackrook7@lemmy.world
        2·
        10 个月前

        I think they collect and use your information even if you don’t use the site though. Isn’t that still true?

        • BenderOver@artemis.camp
          1·
          10 个月前

          That is true. However, the only way they’d get that info is if you made it public to begin with.

          Like getting your cell phone number from a person’s contacts. You had to give that number out to begin with. You should have no expectation of privacy after that. Unless you specifically told your friend/whoever you gave it to, not to. Then that would be on them when they accepted the terms to the site, not the website itself.

          (I do want to reiterate that I don’t support what these kinds of companies do at all.)

      • promitheas@iusearchlinux.fyi
        1·
        10 个月前

        Thats not how the law works, and the law is above any corporation. At least this is still true in Europe. So if the law states that I dont need to give up any rights, then I… Dont need to give up any rights

        • BenderOver@artemis.camp
          2·
          10 个月前

          Yes this would only be in the US. I should’ve put that in one of my earlier comments… thanks for the clarification. Also, while we are at it, I should add do your own research too. I am just a rando and this is my general understanding of how shit works over here. Laws could even vary on state level that I’m not aware of too.

        • BenderOver@artemis.camp
          2·
          10 个月前

          Another thing I’ll add (I can’t edit in Artemis), I didn’t realize it was an EU article to begin with. So that was a big overlook on my part.