We’re all in on the culture war now

  • octochamp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re really hitting the nail on the head with this analogy. If you replaced all the cars with cyclists then yes you’d increase the number of cycle accidents, but no one of those cyclists would be capable of causing anywhere even remotely near the level of carnage one car driver can cause. In fact, the amount of damage a single cyclist can cause would decrease with fewer cars on the road, given that at present the worst damage a cyclist can cause is by indirectly causing a car driver to crash.

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and no.

      We’d see more minor injuries (remember, all commuters are tired cyclists, so they’re more likely to have minor bumps), but many less majore ones (at least among young cyclists, older ones in collisions I do not know enough about to comment reliably).

      Let’s not forget, pedestrians exist as well, and are just as unobservant as cyclists (pedestrians usually have right of way, though no cyclist I know respects that!).

      • octochamp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        these are some absolutely wild generalisations and honestly daft assumptions but I doubt there’s much to be gained arguing this point any more