Either you ridin’ or we pass you, flyin’ by sayin’ fuck you

  • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ARE YOU CURRENTLY IN A PLACE IN WHICH YOU ARE MORE POWERFUL THAN THE BOURGEOIS INTERESTS? NO? THEN READ LENIN AGAIN YOU MOTHERFUCKER.

    Is it a thing in Hexbear to just like, be meaner when you can’t get your point across?

    Maybe having downvotes would make y’all more pleasant to interact with.

    • CommieGabredabok [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      second paragraph

      To carry on a war for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie […] and to renounce in advance any change of tack, […], or any conciliation or compromise with possible allies (even if they are temporary, unstable, vacillating or conditional allies)—is that not ridiculous in the extreme?

      The Black Panther Party in America, for example, had many anarchist comrades within it, a “rainbow coalition,” and so on… For COINTELPRO, however, it is known that Feds have used ultra-left newspapers and anti-AES-focused stories in anarchist papers for psy-ops. Feds mainly targeted the leaders and most outspoken members of the Black Panthers (mostly ML or ML oriented), and many major past members that remain alive are anarchists. Take that as you will.

      also, I have an account on both Lemmygrad and Hexbear. All this infighting is making me angery

    • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it a thing on lemmygrad to pretend to read Lenin and then say the total opposite of what was meant? Is it common practise to selectively quote things out of context and then try to contort ML into blanquism?

      You’re a dishonest actor, there is no need to be nice to you

      • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re both clear that Lenin says to work with people.

        I’m trying to communicate that “left unity” implies a unity of movement beyond temporary alliance.

        If we’re agreed that lenin is recommending temporary alliances, then it feels like we should be agreed that “left unity” (a permanent unity of purpose) isn’t really a thing.

        Is there anything I’ve missed in this summation?

          • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And you’re just being mean because you don’t want to concede the point.

            Can we agree that “left unity” (as a permanent unity of purpose) isn’t a real thing?

            Or are you just going to duck the question and yell at me again?

            • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And you’re just being mean because you don’t want to concede the point.

              No, I’m being mean because you’re being intellectually dishonest and wasting everybody’s time to make a pedantic, useless, and somehow still wrong, point.

              Unless you want to talk about anything other than your pointless need to redefine “Left unity” into a thing it isn’t (and then failing to argue against that), we’re done. You pointless person.