PugJesus@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months ago5th generation warfarelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1610arrow-down112
arrow-up1598arrow-down1image5th generation warfarelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down5·11 months agoAs a German, this word was compounded incorrectly anyway. Adjectives don’t get compounded. So it would be “Beweglicher Torpfostenkrieg”
minus-squarecircuscritic@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up63arrow-down5·11 months agoLook guys, I found the Grammer Nazi.
minus-squareOoops@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoIt’s actually quite easy to correct, so why not mention it? Make that “moving goal post war” a “goal post movement war” and now it’s all nouns and valid to compound them.
minus-squarecircuscritic@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoGerman…Grammer…Nazi… Sir, this is a Noncredible Wendy’s, not a Highly Credible Outback Steakhouse.
minus-squareTurun@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-211 months agoThis is wrong. That would describe a certain type of war, but specify that the war is movable. I think the “Torpfostverschiebekrieg” mentioned in another comment would be the best solution.
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·11 months agoBut surely wouldn’t that imply the existence of such thing as a ‘goal post war’? Because the term is meant to mean ‘(moving goal post) (war)’, and not ‘(moving) (goal post war)’
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoBeweglicher-Torpfosten-Krieg looks about right.
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAh yes that makes sense
minus-squareChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarekhapyman@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoOn the other hand in Finnish that’s can be one word: maalitolpansiirtosota. No sense implied.
As a German, this word was compounded incorrectly anyway. Adjectives don’t get compounded. So it would be “Beweglicher Torpfostenkrieg”
Look guys, I found the Grammer Nazi.
It’s actually quite easy to correct, so why not mention it?
Make that “moving goal post war” a “goal post movement war” and now it’s all nouns and valid to compound them.
German…Grammer…Nazi…
Sir, this is a Noncredible Wendy’s, not a Highly Credible Outback Steakhouse.
This is wrong. That would describe a certain type of war, but specify that the war is movable.
I think the “Torpfostverschiebekrieg” mentioned in another comment would be the best solution.
But surely wouldn’t that imply the existence of such thing as a ‘goal post war’? Because the term is meant to mean ‘(moving goal post) (war)’, and not ‘(moving) (goal post war)’
Beweglicher-Torpfosten-Krieg looks about right.
Ah yes that makes sense
deleted by creator
On the other hand in Finnish that’s can be one word: maalitolpansiirtosota. No sense implied.