• Chloyster [she/her]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems needlessly gatekeepy to me. Are you saying everyone using technology needs to learn exactly how it all works? People aren’t allowed to just use the tools provided to them? Like are cameras worse now that you can just point and shoot vs having to go through many steps for the photo to maybe turn out ok?

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @chloyster I’m sorry if I sound so. No, I do not mean to get into the technicalities of the stuff. What I meant was the fact that technology needs to be a bit more transparent about what is doing, and to have companies stop trying to hide stuff just for the sake of a better user experience. We just need to educate more people into using technology, rather than trying to make it more accessible by sacrificing some power user features and capabilities.

      It’s the same like knowing some basic economics to understand things like ponzi schemes or other types of scams (or simply being able to save more money).

      • Chloyster [she/her]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see what you’re saying. I do agree that people should have the opportunity to be educated to at least a baseline understanding of some things. If for nothing else but to avoid being scammed.

        I mean ideally I would just like these companies to be held responsible for doing shady stuff behind the scenes, I don’t think having easy to understand UIs (and as a result, a bit obfuscated from what’s actually happening) and such have to be a bad thing. But maybe it’s too idealistic to want that and expect companies to actually be held accountable if the obfuscation is hiding bad stuff