As far as I know time moves in just one direction and those dates are after 1918. I’m sorry, I’m not trying to gross you out on purpose. I just don’t understand calling it a Nazi symbol for how it was used after Finnish Air Force adopted it. To me it seems clear that if it was adopted before those things existed/happened then how could they have adopted a Nazi symbol?
That’s where it started but I wouldn’t call him a proto-Nazi at that point. But in any case, point was that when the symbol was adopted, it had nothing to do with Nazis. Unless something being Nazi is some sort of transitive property, traveling back through the chain to 1918.
Two decades after Finnish air force had adopted it. Saying it’s Nazi imaginery based on that would seem a bit strange, like the property of something being Nazi travels back in time.
That guy became a prominent Nazi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_von_Rosen
Lmao
I don’t know if you noticed the 1918 there. I’m not sure even proto-Nazis were around that time.
Hitler joined the party that would become the Nazis in 1919. Von Rosen met Hitler in like 1922.
This little shell game you’re trying to play with the dates is super gross.
As far as I know time moves in just one direction and those dates are after 1918. I’m sorry, I’m not trying to gross you out on purpose. I just don’t understand calling it a Nazi symbol for how it was used after Finnish Air Force adopted it. To me it seems clear that if it was adopted before those things existed/happened then how could they have adopted a Nazi symbol?
Oh wait, the swastika was a symbol for Aryan purity as early as 1912.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/man-who-brought-swastika-germany-and-how-nazis-stole-it-180962812/
I think if we consider those Aryan purity people proto-Nazis (and I think we can) then I admit to being wrong about proto-Nazis being around.
That’s kind of you, thank you.
Eh, online arguments are bad enough without people stubbornly refusing to admit when they’re wrong. I try.
I was refuting your claim that Nazism wasn’t around at the time.
And what’s your excuse for it’s continued use after 1920, when it publicly became a Nazi symbol?
Did they just not have paint, and wanted to be polite to the guy who donated 1 plane?
The time was 1918 and you cited stuff from 1919 and 1922?
I’d imagine they didn’t want to change their logo because of some German party, at least first.
Hitler’s origin story is literally getting owned in ww1
That’s where it started but I wouldn’t call him a proto-Nazi at that point. But in any case, point was that when the symbol was adopted, it had nothing to do with Nazis. Unless something being Nazi is some sort of transitive property, traveling back through the chain to 1918.
Two decades after Finnish air force had adopted it. Saying it’s Nazi imaginery based on that would seem a bit strange, like the property of something being Nazi travels back in time.
He was the Brother in law to Herman Goering lmaoooo. That “Swedish count” was a high ranking Nazi.
Nazis weren’t a thing in 1918, when the symbol was adopted.