• 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    What truly annoys me about biopics is that Hollywood makes no attempt these days at these being true to the real-life characters they’re portraying. They’re 100% fiction using well-known public figures as the source of their verisimilitude. Movies like The Social Network and The Imitation Game, to name just these two, have barely any resemblance to their real-life counterparts. That’s also true of Bohemian Rhapsody.

    Given that, I don’t even understand what’s the point of them.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I got the feeling that Oppenheimer is quite true to the events compared to many other Hollywood biopics. I could read Wikipedia about the events after watching the movie and think “oh yeah, that happened in the movie” for many paragraphs. Some lines in the movie are even accurate word for word.

      The Imitation Game is pure fiction Abraham Lincoln the Vampire Hunter by comparison. It’s a fascinating story to base a movie on, but they decide to throw it all out and instead replace it with something completely made up. I hate how they wasted that potential.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point is first and foremost to entertain, not be a record for formal historical archiving.