Not sure if this fits here, feel free to remove if not.

I’m sure the algorithm must be working as intended, but I always see a lot of rapid-fire posts under each other when browsing “Hot”. Is this normal or am I missing a setting?

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The formula for hot is something like upvotes - downvotes - age^2

    Often, votes can’t keep up with the square on the age.

    Old Reddit used the same formula without the square. That worked much better.

    • alehel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Would be cool if we could define our own custom algorithm, but I guess that might be taxing the servers to much if we could.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had a feeling it was something like that, this makes sense, thanks. Would you recommend a different sorting method?

      • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think instance admins can remove the square, but I’m not sure. Otherwise, given that Lemmy does not have that many users, I often stick with Hot anyways, and only look at active from time to time if I feel hot gets too boring. And if active is also boring, I do something else.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        On my subscribed, I use new. I mostly subscribe to more niche communities, so its fairly quick.

        On local, I tend to use top 12hrs, and on all, top for 6 hours.

        Edit: note/more autocorrect.