Not defending Dementia Donny and either way I’m not shelling out $80 for a game ever, just wondering if this is really a result of the tariffs. I understand the console price being high due to them but I don’t see how it would affect the price of games that are essentially going to be 100% digital

  • Noerknhar@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Nothing to do with tariffs, just a reflection of higher development cost and, and that’s perfectly fine to an extent, the very core principle of capitalism.

    Let’s please not discuss if capitalism is good. It’s just the way it is.

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That would only be true if you ignore every other part of the price calculation. For example because the numbers of sold consoles are much higher than in the past, more people are buying the games, leading to more income for the game development cost, leading to the same prize.

      See? By ignoring every other influencing factor I can also argue the complete opposite of you.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s a basic supply and demand curve… Guess what happens when demand is high? There’s no reason to lower prices if you have high enough supply(digital copies are infinite). Your argument is completely invalid. If anything, it’s proof to them that they CAN charge more and SHOULD.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Exactly. So then the number of sold units is only $$$ in their eyes, not a reason to be more efficient.

      • Noerknhar@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        We all know that defining a price for a product across markets, regions, continents is more complex than “development cost”, “inflation”, “greed”, or “NiNtEnDo”.

        Factually, it has nothing to do with tariffs, and definitely has to do with cost and capitalism. Feel free to add what’s missing, but please be complete, as someone will likely argue differently because of something you forgot.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Let’s please not discuss if capitalism is good.

      Brings up the “merits” of capitalism, but refuses to discuss the “merits” of capitalism.

      It’s just the way it is.

      Yeah, it’s because have this mentality that it’s this way.

      Btw: capitalism is a plague on society and has done nothing but ruin the things we (consumers) hold dear, because capitalism stifles innovation and wrings whatever blood from a turnip it can.

      • Noerknhar@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        We are here to discuss Nintendo’s prices, not the economical system itself. This would derail the conversation too much.

        If you want to go down the rabbit hole, I suggest you open a new thread. However, keep in mind that the majority of Lemmy users will likely agree, given that this is a bit of a leftist echo chamber. And to make sure we’re on the same page: we ARE on the same page. Capitalism isn’t what we want, yet, it is what we currently have (and will have when Mario Cart will release for Switch 2).