• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Ask Claude to add 36 and 59 and the model will go through a series of odd steps, including first adding a selection of approximate values (add 40ish and 60ish, add 57ish and 36ish). Towards the end of its process, it comes up with the value 92ish. Meanwhile, another sequence of steps focuses on the last digits, 6 and 9, and determines that the answer must end in a 5. Putting that together with 92ish gives the correct answer of 95,” the MIT article explains."

    That is precisrly how I do math. Feel a little targeted that they called this odd.

    • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think it’s odd in the sense that it’s supposed to be software so it should already know what 36 plus 59 is in a picosecond, instead of doing mental arithmetics like we do

      At least that’s my takeaway

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Fascist. If someone does maths differently than your preference, it’s not “weird shit”. I’m facile with mental math despite what’s perhaps a non-standard approach, and it’s quite functional to be able to perform simple to moderate levels of mathematics mentally without relying on a calculator.