Summary

Russia was excluded from Trump’s sweeping tariff list due to existing U.S. sanctions that limit trade, White House officials claimed.

Despite lower trade volumes, countries like Syria were still included, prompting skepticism.

Trump has prioritized ending the war in Ukraine and threatened 50% tariffs on nations buying Russian oil. Russian state media framed the omission as sanctions-based, not favoritism, with some mocking Trump’s harsher stance on allies.

Ukraine, meanwhile, faces a 10% tariff despite the country’s strategic partnership with the U.S.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Right, because even though we both know you were wrong, you’re too fragile to admit it.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Not fragile. I really do recall seeing an article about this, and digging into finding it to show that I was only wrong admit the citation and not the content of the comment and my heart. But thats a chore and I’m putting off spending time doing that.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Trust me bro, I was right, I just don’t feel like proving it.

              Fragile little ego. So pathetic.

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Turns out it was an NY Times article, which you are free to search for yourself because this thirsty for attention wannabe troll shit can fuck right off.

                Fun fact: Being abrasive and needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn’t a great way to go through life.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 minutes ago

                  Turns out it was an NY Times article

                  No it wasn’t, you’re lying again.

                  needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn’t a great way to go through life

                  Asking people for sources for their outlandish claims is “being spoonfed baby food” now.

                  Jesus, you’ll really do anything but just admit to being wrong. It’s so cringe.

                  Look, you came into this thread trying to dunk on people, got proven wrong, pivoted and doubled down, got proven wrong again and you just can’t seem to handle that fact. We both know it. Just admit it and take the L.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Come on, it’s not that long. You must have seen how utterly wrong you are by now.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Lol the irony…

      Of course I know what article you were talking about. Go ahead and read it again and then quote me where it says anything about generating a list of countries that somehow leaves out Russia.