• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      FPTP ensures that every vote in the winning party goes to the electoral college.

      So if you vote 51% dem, and 49% republican, in a FPTP state 100% of all electoral votes are dem.

      If you have a system like IRV where you split it between the electoral as fairly as possible, you lose literally half of your votes. And given that EVERY red state uses FPTP, aside from nebraska you’re running a wildly uphill battle. You should be targeting red states first. And blue states last, otherwise we will almost certainly end up in a worse position, losing TONS of our voting potential.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, right. So almost like a prisoner’s dilemma bind. And I guess a national change is fairly unlikely any time soon…

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          yeah, literally, you’re fucked if you do, and you’re fucked if you don’t. The only situation in which you win here is starting in red states.

          also, a federal change to the law is illegal afaik, so it would have to be something that either, states individually agree on unanimously, or something the federal government can’t even control.