• Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      Interesting, didn’t know that. Ironically, I’ve unintentionally followed this definition anyway because I think open-source is so incredible that I always describe FOSS as specifically FOSS, not “just” freeware.

      In fact, I’ve pivoted so strongly to FOSS as of late that I haven’t even said the word “freeware” in… years… dang…

      • Baldur Nil@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I think we’re naturally a bit suspicious of freeware as “misleading” because so many old software used to be just vectors to install malware (mostly spam) alongside it. At least for me, I only trust it either if it is open source or it has a sustainable business model.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          yea, “freeware” has that suspicious connotation to me as well. The mark of an era

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      Interesting. I interpreted this definition more like an oval vs. circle distinction. The vast majority of ovals aren’t circles, but circles are a subset of ovals.