• LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The irony here is that violence is a necessary action when the bourgeoisie (Billionaires) leaves the working class no other option. But what he’s saying is that state violence is justified to maintain the status quo.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Billionaires are not bourgeoisle. Bourgeoisie means “middle class”. When Lenin targeted the bourgeosie he was targeting the middle class, not the billionaires.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        You seem to be confusing the meaning of “middle class” of bourgeoisie. This did not refer to what we think of today as “middle class”. This was in reference to a pre-revolutionary fuedal societies like Tsarist Russia. The “Upper class” being the structures of the monarch. The middle class being the bourgeoisie (the capital owning class). And the lowest class the proletariat (working class).

        Obviously when we use bourgeoisie today we do not have a Monarchy. So it is still referring to the capitalist class. Revolutions were fought against monarchs that were replaced by the bourgeoisie (capitalist class). Lenin believed that instead of having a revolution to capitalism from fuedalism, that Russia could transition from a fuedal to socialist society and skip the rule of the bourgeoisie.

        Lenin was not “targeting” what we think of today as “the middle class”. If someone told you that without explaining the above history they were either lying or ignorant.