Post had nothing to do with murder or violence. It is clear who reddit serves.

  • QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If “Section 230” is repealed by the Maga-Idiots any US social media plattfrom will become liable for what the user’s posts, they will have to do MUCH cleanup.

    Any threat. Any wrongful accusation, and harm done to reputation will be OWNED not by the user in question… but the company providing the plattform, as if they are a newspaper and all users are staff writers.

    Imagine writing “Dodge only make shitty cars that break all the time” on X, and X is now held accountable by Stellantis for damaging their reputation.

    I hope they do it. Plattforms that make billions from free work of the users, should own the liabilities.

    • ödd (they/them)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      it would also un-shield any site from user generated content, making lemmy instance operators liable. all comment boxes on any site would disappear; the dead internet theory would become a reality overnight within the us

      • QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Well than don’t operate within the US.

        The Maga aßholes want to be hateful on the internet without getting moderated. Without moderation it’s okay that the plattform becomes the publisher and is liable. I’d not be sad for meta/reddit/Twitter to just implode on legal fees… owning the fake news they allow to be distributed…while making money off advertisers…

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I was for this when it passed originally but now seeing what these companies have done with it in the intervening years, I think maybe I was giving them too much benefit of the doubt