AI-generated child sex imagery has every US attorney general calling for action::“A race against time to protect the children of our country from the dangers of AI.”

    • ram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Psychologists.

      There’s no evidence that CSAM, real or virtual, helps reduce rates of child predation.

        • ram@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          (it’s not)

          I’d love if you could cite your evidence.

        • ram@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it’s beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim.

          • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And what if CG porn is that help

            That’s not claiming it is benefical. It’s entertaining the idea that what if it is.

            • ram@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then that can be decided by psychologists. It’s funny you keep insisting on calling it “CG porn” though when it’s abjectly and legally child pornography.