• naeap@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is nobody talking about the fucking double spine?

    Or am I somehow stupid and interpreted that fucked up graphic wrong - if that even is possibly, because so much is wrong with that?

    • DrT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s anatomically correct. These are the spinous processes cut in half.

      • naeap@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m actually not sure if I’m falling for a joke here, but that’s how I remember that a spine looks like

        Even if it’s a section view, there shouldn’t be 2 of them… Or maybe I just don’t see it correctly…

        Edit: ah, now I somehow see it. But still, it doesn’t really look correct with the spinal cord like splitting it. Although given that this would be a bit hard to visualise in a 2D slice…
        I’m still not convinced that this is actually correct ;⁠-⁠)