• Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    adding that the focus should remain on “evidence-based efforts to prevent and end homelessness.”

    You don’t need “evidence-based” approaches for obvious shit like building dense walkable neighbours and increasing lower class incomes.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Funny how this is always presented as some novel problem as if this particular issue hasn’t been demonstrably solved in many countries around the world. We know what evidence-based approach is. You dedicate resources to build affordable housing at state level. That’s the fucking solution.

  • heatenconsumerist [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Meanwhile giving Ukraine and Israel hundreds of billions of dollars

    FUCK amerikkka

    It’s also WAY HIGHER than 770k. USA cooks tf outta that book

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Even undershooting it, its an absurd number. My town population is like 300k so to think there are more than double that amount of people living like that in the US and being treated as invisible is crazy, its insane that it just keeps growing.

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Since 2020, my local food bank has gone from free food, to rate limiting families to a set quantity of food per month, to now means-testing applicants to receive food after the end of this month.

    But did you know!!! The 0.01% have tripled their net worth since then! The economy is THRIVING! GDP!!!

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    It’s headlines like this one that make me want to start throwing stuff whenever someone makes the argument that the left is undermining the democrats by refusing to be satisfied with whatever crumbs they’re throwing us this week. Everyone knows the Republicans suck, so criticizing the one party that still pretends to be accountable to its ostensible constituents for not doing enough to help those constituents should be a reasonable thing to do. The only rub here is that the Democratic leadership does not want to actually help, does not want to be held accountable, and doesn’t want to be criticized, and so they’ve managed to convince their followers that reflecting on what’s actually happening to society’s most vulnerable is treasonous empowerment of the Republicans, who are the enemy but also reasonable people whom we still need to work with.

    Nothing here is new, I’m just updating everyone on my slow slide into incoherence as I continue to gaze into the abyss.

  • normal_user [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    52 minutes ago

    Quoting the article:

    “No American should face homelessness, and the Biden-Harris Administration is committed to ensuring every family has access to the affordable, safe, and quality housing they deserve,” HUD Agency Head Adrianne Todman said in a statement, adding that the focus should remain on “evidence-based efforts to prevent and end homelessness.”

    Have they forgotten that the Biden-Harris Administration was (and still is), the one in charge ?
    How does such an increase in homelessness show the commitment they said they have on fixing this issue ? It obviusly shows the opposite, that they don’t care about it.

    Is this really where journalism is at !?

  • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    23 hours ago

    But I was told to look at the graphs and see how good everything is. I wonder if the graphdorks will look at this one, or if they have some bs reason to dismiss this one like they do with all the other ones they don’t like.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      22 hours ago

      the graphdorks

      My go-to lib graphdork is an obnoxious turbolib named Will Stancil. I assume he must argue with leftists almost every single day on Twitter and/or Bluesky. He can’t help himself.

      I changed the order so it’s Reddit-like and his comment is effectively a reply.

      Is homelessness not part of “the economy” in this formulation? Like, a large increase in homelessness is a part of the economic picture. To act like “the economy” can be walled off from homelessness is pretty crazy in my opinion.

      It absolutely is part of the economy. And a large increase in homelessness is bad. But this is a fraction of a percent of the population - even a fraction of a percent of the LOW-INCOME population. So it doesn’t tell you much about the larger economy standing alone. We have broader measures for that

      https://subium.com/profile/whstancil.bsky.social/post/3lecs4faat22t

      God, what a ghoul he is. “Homelessness is bad but…” I’d poke at him but I can’t. The day Steve Albini died - Stancil said something like he was “grief-stricken”. It seemed like a lie to me so I replied with something like “Do you mean that? Or did you say it for street cred?” And he blocked me within a few minutes.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      23 hours ago

      the graphdorks look at this one and conclude since economy go up that these are 770,000 cases of parallel yet unrelated individual failures