• keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    Tiny fighter sized AWACS, I guess.

    My future prediction is AA missiles will have a variety of sensors that they switch between to home in on wifi (then traDAR or visual if signal goes out) and maybe loiter above the battlefield to intercept upwards facing signals.

    Also they’d have low RCS, which we’ve started to see on cruise missiles.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        The line between drone and loiter missile is fuzzy. Given the focus the USA puts on its air forces (high capital investment, low manpower requirement), I’m on the side of the missiles

        • AnarchoAnarchist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think the performance of the Resistance over the last year has proven, you don’t need a Navy or an Air Force, you just need enough missiles.

          In the last year we’ve had our first ballistic missile attack on a ship at sea, loitering antiair munitions taking out drones, loitering air to ground drones making mass mechanized formations a relic of the past, on every side of every conflict.

          I struggle for the right word, but it’s almost a “democratization” of military power. Anti-second amendment people are right that an AR-15 is not going to stop a tank. But a cheap commercial drone rigged with explosives and a front-facing camera, will.