People in the west should stop this madness …hek whom am I kidding ,they won’t .

  • NormalC [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The POTUS can launch nuclear weapons without any briefing or coordination with the rest of the government. It is his sole power, not even the legislative congress can override him.

    The Russian head of state must consult with their top brass to even have the ability to do so.

    The CPC have a documented retaliation policy and can’t just launch nukes preemptively.

    Nice shitlib logic. You just repackage white superemacy with imperialist characteristics because that model of the world absolves you of urgency.

    • randomname01@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Power within their own country, I meant, and it was abundantly clear. Also, I was talking about Western leaders in general, and even if your example is an argument against what I said it applies to only one country.

      That’s not to defend the nuclear button or the US in general. But come on, my guy. We’re talking about the power they hold over the people and how they relate to the capital class, and the US’ dodgy nuclear weapons policies honestly have little to do with that.

      • NormalC [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Again, you’re minimizing when faced with an inherent contradiction.

        The US is not “one country”, it is the entire security apparatus of the modern imperial core of minority nations. Every western leader is aligned with the US for legitimacy and resources. US policy dictates the global climate. The rise of reactionary fascist politics in Western Europe under Trump was not a coincidence.

        Would it surprise you to learn that the DPRK has repeatedly petioned the US to mutually dearm its nukes and the US has refused? The nuclear “button” is the entire point of this thread. It is also the way the US threatens the integrity of the entire world.

        • randomname01@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of that has to do with what I’m talking about. Fucking of course the US is the head of the bloc of capitalist countries and fucking of course they use the threat of violence to uphold their global position of power. But none of that relates to what I said in any meaningful way.

          You could argue about how the US is bad until the cows come home and I’d most likely agree with all of it, but you’re talking past my basic point here.

          • NormalC [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your initial point is that Putin has more power in his own country than any other western leader.

            I provided a clear example of why that isn’t the case and is related to OP’s original topic. POTUS can fire nukes with zero oversight, Putin cannot.

            You flipped out when faced with this and deflected my point. You didn’t even reiterate your “basic point”

            Nice going, liberal.

            • randomname01@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My original comment was already about how Western leaders and Putin relate to both the capital and the working class. Your argument against this is one power that one Western leader holds that doesn’t even relate to class relations at all.

              Like, I’m not denying the disproportionate power it gives the POTUS on the world stage, but that wasn’t what I was talking about in the first place.