• SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely. I just find it a bit…much when they try to label this as a means to protect staff when everything they do signals that isn’t their main motive.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotcha. I understand your point of view, I just think maybe they can do both? Protect their liability against being sued for safety on the workplace and at the same time reduce the risk of their employees getting hurt.

      • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s all we ask. I understand why they want to ensure products aren’t being stolen, but I also feel like they could be doing significantly more to ensure colleagues aren’t being intimidated and assaulted.

        Of course, the best way for staff to feel safer is if customers stopped being absolutely dickheads, but we seem to be going on the wrong way on that front.