• TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What is the benefit from lying? I don’t get it. This is all basic info.

      The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.

      It was also on the table at Camp David.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How does that prove they’re lying about Israel currently not supporting it?

        Right now they’re wanting to just take the land after eliminating the people who lived there

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because I said it was on the table several times in the past. And they wrote:

          Very cool and false

          ???

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes because they’ve (Israel) always negotiated in good faith. Even the camp David accords was a 2 state solution in name only

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well, there you have it. The most unproductive statements as usual. If you don’t know the specifics, why comment? Why not discuss the actual policies or the historical details? Why live in the realm of memes and buzzwords? Oh wait… I know why

              • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                You really want to discuss the specifics and history of just the versions that make Israel look good?

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Why, do the details make Israel look good? Is there a reason to shy away from having a meaningful discussion or is it better to hide behind memes and catchphrases

                  • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 hours ago

                    They don’t. And you’re the one calling everything buzzwords, memes and catchphrases now.

                    Whats amazing is wanting to go into the history when that makes Israel look even worse. But you do you

                    Finally going through your comment history I see you’re nothing but a constrain. There’s nothing productive from further discussion. Have a great holiday

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ok now explain why Israel does not accept the deal since Hamas does accept it.

        I do not have to read any history to disprove your lies. I can open the news right now.