The current default “Homepage” value is “All”. That makes sense for users with zero subscribed magazines, so they see something.

But for users with one or more subscribed magazines, the default value for “Homepage” needs to be “Subscriptions”.

That’s partially just because subscriptions mean little if the default frontpage ignores them. But there’s a more important reason than that.

The current situation is that posts in m/Conservative are heavily downvoted, and barely upvoted. (Whatever your politics may be, consider if this was happening to you.) As more ex-redditors join, this problem is likely to worsen.

Eventually moderators need better controls, to say things like “Only members can vote”, etc.

But for now, a very easy fix is to change the default value of “Homepage” to be “Subscriptions”. Of course, “All” should still be a selectable option for those who prefer it.

  • Xuerian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    kbin is part of the Fediverse. It is one instance of many.

    I draw your attention to the sidebar:

    Create your own instance
    
    Clone repo and develop fediverse
    
    

    Several communities who have more difficult interactions with others have already followed this route.

    • 10A@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Encouraging fracturing into factions does no good for anyone. The internet needs a frontpage, and for years that was reddit. Now it seems to be kbin, maybe. Under the hood it may be a distributed system, but in practice normal people want a single website where a wide diversity of topics and opinions is embraced and protected.

      • Xuerian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but it won’t be kbin, or other Fediverse sites.

        It’s a common enough opinion to want one site to handle everything, but that’s not how this is set up.

        • 10A@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I think it is. Much as the underlying architecture expects federation, each instance competes in a market of commoditized goods, which leads to coalescence. So if the fediverse thrives at all, it will be with one giant instance. Perhaps there’ll always be a few other tiny instances for nerds (I use the word lovingly) who value that sort of thing, but normal people don’t understand the concept of an “instance”, and just want to show up at a .com to feast on data.

          At any rate, even if you’re right about federation, any social media service should seek to accommodate a wide diversity of ideas, opinions, and perspectives.

          • hellequin67@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They don’t really need to understand the concepts of an instance within the federation system because ultimately you join whatever instance you want and search and then you can subscribe to anything you want it doesn’t matter whether it’s a one entire instance or one tiny instance in the federation.

            • 10A@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are already many observable instances (pardon the pun) of confusion, even among us early adopters. Time will tell if you’re right or if I am.