• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They can limit their own greenhouse gas emissions, by doing things like subsidizing the conversion of homes which currently use fossil fuels for heating, hot water heating, and cooking to not do so, as well as subsidize solar panels on home roofs.

    This won’t lower temperatures from where they are now, but it does reduce the future increase.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, it let’s people know the issue is serious. If places like Florida that are suffering the effects of climate change already don’t take it seriously, when it’s to their benefit now, why should other places do anything when it doesn’t affect them yet.

      Of course they should, and it will.

    • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In all honesty, it sounds nice and I am not against the idea, but I really have a hard time seeing it having any measurable effect.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Each tiny drop on its own raises the water level an imperceptible amout. Together they fill a lake

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they would extract heat from the air or even the water, it would actually help. Not by leaps and bounds but it would at least be carbon negative.