• zik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But why not skip the expense and nuclear waste and just build up mixed renewable energy instead? It’s cheaper and plenty of places have already done it with great success.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you talking about wind mills and solar? They won’t supply enough power and have other draw backs. Everything has pros and cons.

      Nuclear is consistent, safe and affordable. We have been using nuclear power for 50 years with few issues.

      • zik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of places already doing a mix of renewables with in-fill from batteries and transient gas generation and it works just fine. eg. South Australia. No coal or nuclear is needed and the gas is gradually being phased out with other renewable sources.