Bitwarden introduced a non-free dependency to their clients. The Bitwarden CTO tried to frame this as a bug but his explanation does not really make it any less concerning.

Perhaps it is time for alternative Bitwarden-compatible clients. An open source client that’s not based on Electron would be nice. Or move to something else entirely? Are there any other client-server open source password managers?

  • thayerw@lemmy.caEnglish
    372·
    16 hours ago

    I can only speak for myself, but I would never trust opaque, proprietary software to manage my credentials, especially in a networked environment. For me, that’s a total showstopper.

    I’ve never had need to use Bitwarden or Vaultwarden as I’ve always been happy with KeePass, but this news would definitely have me choosing an alternative.

    • Lucy :3@feddit.orgEnglish
      519·
      14 hours ago

      I always found it weird for people to recommend BitWarden … it just FELT like a company that’ll go completely off track sooner or later. And it did. Oh wonder. KeePass ftw!

      • Lemmchen@feddit.orgEnglish
        10·
        11 hours ago

        completely off track

        Let’s see how things evolve before declaring things like that.

      • Darorad@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        9 hours ago

        Eh, there’s a completely independent reimplementation of the server, so I’d be surprised if the same doesn’t happen for the apps if there’s a real issue that comes up