• fkn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you didn’t edit it then I must have transformed some things in my brain… I apologize.

    I think math is a process. The discovery of math is at least. Consider the origin of the incompleteness theorem. Mathematicians (Hilbert primarily) sought to prove that math is purely a construction of interpreted symbols that was wholly self-contained (primarily that everything provable within math only requires math to prove). Godel later proved, using only math, that math is incomplete. That is to specifically say, that there are things in math that are true, that you cannot prove with math. This means that there are more true things in math than you can prove. Simultaneously Godel demonstrated that this is also true for everything outside of math.

    Deep in this proof is this seemingly magical thing that proves that the process of science can’t prove all true things… Because the process of science is math.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Science can’t prove all true things, or even prove anything with absolute certainty, but you can get closer to the truth through science. Some things might not be knowable through science, but if they aren’t knowable, they probably wouldn’t have a real world use. If parallel universes exist and there’s no way to access them or prove they exist, then it basically might as well not exist. It would make no difference if there are no consequences of it being real or not. Unless there are consequences of something existing, something we can do with the knowledge, it only satisfies our curiosity. It sucks, but that might be the practical answer.

      • fkn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think I didn’t convey my point well.

        Regardless, I am also a physicalist and I believe that empirical evidence is required for a thing to have support in the scientific sense.