Was there an alternative adjective to “clockwise” other than “the rotation you take around left hand”?

Also, how did all watch companies around the world agree on what the direction of “clockwise” is?

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You have to specify which part you’re referring to

    What do you mean by that?

    • Nash42@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Turning right, looking at the top of the clock, is different from turning right while looking at the bottom of the clock. And so on.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not entirely wrong, but the convention is to refer to the top of the wheel. But you could be looking at the wheel from the other side, which would change its direction from your perspective.

        • kuneho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s true, but saying clockwise/anticlockwise also works with fixed perspective, unless the thing itself has a fixed orientation. but if that’s the case, left/right works the same.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, it’s an extra level of confusion. Clockwise/counterclockwise only has one axis of confusion (looking from front or behind) with one option being the obvious default. Left/right have this axis AND the axis of top/bottom for confusion. It’s literally one bit more ambiguous.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No matter which direction a ball rolls, part of it moves to the right, and part to the left (either top right and bottom left, or vice versa). If you don’t specify which part of the ball you’re looking at, it could be either top or bottom, so the statement is ambiguous.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, they are well-defined. There is no missing information in “clockwise”. There is missing information in “right”.

          There is no “top clockwise” or “bottom clockwise”.