Ukraine has received the first F-16 fighter jets that it has sought for months to fight back against an onslaught of Russian missile strikes, a U.S. official confirmed to The Associated Press.

A Ukrainian lawmaker also confirmed Ukraine had received a small number of F-16 fighter jets. The two officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not permitted to speak on the subject publicly.

Ukraine has been pushing its Western allies for F-16s for Ukraine for months, saying they were critically needed to fight back against the onslaught of missiles Russia has fired against it. The F-16 is specialized in suppressing enemy air defenses. The West has hesitantly moved toward providing the jets, after previous concerns that arming Ukraine with advanced weaponry would further escalate the war with Russia.

The U.S. has also been training Ukrainian pilots on how to fly the jets and has already graduated the first group of pilots on its operation.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Anyone more informed than me have a read on the possible impact that could have on the war? I imagine at the very least they will be getting pilots back who were training for this plus extra jets than they already have which by itself would be quite helpful. Beyond that does this represent a significant step change in the capabilities of the Ukrainian airforce? I’m guessing and hoping yes based on all the anticipation around this but I know nothing about this stuff.

    EDIT: Thanks for the replies below. I also saw another interesting analysis that pointed out that Ukraine can now use a much larger stockpile of standard NATO munitions that the F-16 is compatible with. Seems like an absolutely huge deal.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      One of the main things it does is actually prevent them losing a capability rather than granting them a new one. It can replace a lot of the Russian- or Soviet-built planes that Ukraine started the war with and obviously can’t easily replace now. That’s not particularly exciting and doesn’t change the course of things, but it does prevent the course changing in a bad way

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Here’s what I think I’m remembering right from a video I saw a couple months ago:

      Ukraine currently has a fleet of aging MiGs which they’ve improvised ways of using some NATO munitions on. One of which is the HARM anti-radiation (anti-radar, basically) missile. Again if I understand this right, when used on their MiGs the HARM missile can only be used in one or two of several modes it has, where an all NATO F-16 can use all modes of the missile.

      Also, they have more total jets now, so they’ve got that going for them, which is nice.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Generally in terms of numbers, if they get all the f-16s that were promised, they will be back to something around the size of the Air Force they had when they started the war. It will still be much smaller than Russia’s, but it will be a big improvement over where they are now.

      As for additional capabilies, these are the main ones:

      • Used with the correct munitions, they will have a longer range for air to air and air to ground strikes, meaning they have a good chance to hit enemy aircraft without the enemy aircraft being able to hit them. This can help make a big dent against the glidebombs which Russia is currently using to great effect.
      • The new types of missles will allow “fire and forget” capability meaning that they can quickly get out of harm’s way once they shoot their munitions
      • New types of missles like HARM missles will allow them to more easily take out enemy air defenses.

      But it’s also worth considering that learning to use a new fighter jet even in the most basic way takes a year. To get really good in one takes many years. So it will probably take some time still before they really get proficient with this new capability.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It enables the use of NATO munitions, or which there’s a lot of possible sources. Ukraine’s previous platform was Soviet.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      My impression is that they’ll be important in pushing Russian jets further back from the front line, which is crucial in stopping the glide bombs, which have been all too effective.

      In addition, while Ukraine already has HARMs, my understanding is that using them from an F16 gives some capabilities that make them much more dangerous to Russian air defence.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Months?

    Pretty sure it’s been 2+ years since they asked. Wonder if they even got AMRAAMs with em, otherwise they’re gonna be useless for air to air.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope we give them as many as they need to beat back Russia. And any other weapons they need. Fuck russia.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Until I start seeing combat footage, I’m assuming they still aren’t in theatre.

  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s see if this sticks… nothing else has really been able to stall recent Russian advances.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago
    Associated Press Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Name: Associated Press Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.