Ex-Tesla employee reveals shocking details on worker conditions: ‘You get fired on the spot.’::Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s ‘ultra hardcore’ work culture is revealed to have led to long hours, unsafe conditions, and harassment for employees.

  • SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to mention protesting likely means becoming homeless. It means losing insurance, it means losing you car insurance and likely paying a hefty premium when you can get it again. It means losing access to food, Healthcare. It means risking being barred from future employment.

    So let’s vote? Well turns out your district is shaped like a contorted snake, and unless you convince 60% of people who will vote for any loony who hates the same people they do, to help their neighbor for once, well you’re SOL.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Leaving your job doesn’t automatically mean becoming homeless and starving. That is a pretty extreme and unrealistic stance.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        When 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck (by design) it really does.

        How do you propose they make rent the next month with no money?

          • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you maybe not see the context of my comment?

            We’re talking about whether or not it’s feasible for your average American to quit their job in protest in order to secure workers rights (of which a social security net is part) and your contribution is that they can quit their job in protest to get things like a social security net, by already having a social security net?

            Very helpful, thank you

      • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t something like 50% of the US workforce paycheck to paycheck? That’s very much by design. Look up any strikebreaking action in history, the strategy is always for businesses to see if they can hold out longer than their workers, and if they can, no concessions are necessary.

        Our stability and ability to strike is diametrically opposed to the desires of those in power. Until we get the guillotines out again, I’m not really sure how any of this could possibly change. Under capitalism, there is no incentive for it.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          we could probably manage it with a concerted long rent strike, but everyone would have to be in on it, and the way this country is divided, doesn’t seem possible.

      • Do it out of spite.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly for too many people this is the case. If you’re paycheck to paycheck losing a job could leave you chose between starving or homelessness. Not to mention how long it might that unfortunate soul to get another source of income that is enough to back to just making it. They might have to settle for lower pay.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it pretty much does, I’m lucky I’m on disability. Cuz in this one horse town, you can go months or years between jobs. I may be getting paid in chump change and pizza parties…

        But at least I can eat pizza…