[…]the widespread use of the symbol on products that are not routinely accepted for recycling is helping stoke “consumer confusion about what is recyclable and/or compostable” and is leading to “deceptive or misleading” claims on packaging, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

At issue is the use of the logo along with the “resin number” of different types of plastics. Resin one and two plastics, such as bottles and jugs, are the most easily recycled products, but those marked with numbers three to seven, categories that include plastic bags, styrofoam and plastic trays, are typically not recycled and are instead sent to landfills or burned.

The placement of the chasing arrows symbol upon these hard-to-recycle single-use plastics “does not accurately represent recyclability as many plastics (especially 3-7) do not have end markets, and are not financially viable to recycle,” the EPA said in its comments.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Your argument that companies made the decision for us is valid up until I start thinking about plastic cutlery.

    Nobody is forcing anyone to buy plastic forks/spoons for their picnics or potlucks. That’s all a consumer decision based on the convenience of throwing the mess away versus washing dishes.

    I don’t disagree with you at all, but I feel the need to point out that our hands aren’t clean either.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, there are some customer decisions around. But most of the time the choice the customers have is between this package of plastic-wrapped toilet paper or the other package of plastic-wrapped toilet paper.

      It’s not like there is usually also a package of paper-wrapped toilet paper, no matter how much sense that would make.