• DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait, are you claiming they don’t? (assuming you mean a positive CO₂ footprint means net emission of CO₂).

    Well, yes. As opposed to a negative footprint, for things that maybe not directly reduce co2 by indirectly, such as renewable energies - solar panels being one of them.

    Solar panels absolutely don’t reduce CO₂. They make things worse more slowly, just as electric cars do, but they’re still making things worse. They are most certainly not carbon neutral, let alone permanently capturing CO₂. They’re an energy multiplier, which is less bad than using the energy without the multiplier, but it isn’t a net positive.

    Which I think is probably the crux of OPs point.

    Hence my cave & stone tablet comment. OP surely does not own a carbon neutral computer and uses a carbon neutral internet. But yes, technically speaking solar panels are carbon neutral, since they can generate more power than they consume. Obviously this very much depends on what this energy is ultimately used for but that’s just pedantic.