I mean, it’s usually used to undermine a cause by killing their leaders, but their death can also cause them to become a martyr and get even more support. Which is generally true for the majority of assassinations?

Why I asked? Because recent events in Ecuador got me wondering.

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From my limited sample size, they don’t help. But they don’t help the cause of the assassin either.

    Paradoxically, the winner seems to be the status quo as society clamps down on the people around the assassin, and mainstreams the victim as part of the grieving process.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then, when the assassin is doing so in order to preserve some status quo, they win.

      Example: MLK. Killing him did a great job of preventing a very very very charismatic leader from bringing white and black people together against their corporate overlords.

      Another example is the infiltration and sabotage of OWS.