• afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It really isn’t that hard to tell the difference between bots activities and humans. If Facebook can detect a nipple in a picture in microseconds they can tell that “hmm a surprisingly high number of IoT fridges have strong opinions about this anti-Putin blogger, starting last week” isn’t valid.

        • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That sounds like the millions of doctored amazon reviews and social media bot-boosted content should be dealt with by next week then.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If there was an incentive to do so there would be.

            Alphabet doesn’t have real competition. If they start getting some they will be motivated to improve. Amazon the same way. You order crap from them and they still make their money. Social media the same way, there is just no particular reason for them to anything about bots when bots don’t impact ad numbers.

            The corporation I work for has a captcha on the website to do pretty much anything useful. We have an incentive to not have bots.

    • bc93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s an interesting idea but I think you’d very quickly see far-right groups dogpiling onto and sinking small leftist websites and blogs and promoting their own shit-tier content.