Expected to arrive at the end of the year, Cities Skylines 2 increasingly shows what is his goal: after some promotional trailers, the game seems to aim for

  • Andjhostet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope it isn’t locked into a liberalism ideology too much. If I want to make food and housing a human right, workers employed by the state, and/or democratically owned workplaces do I have the option for that?

    My utopian city has no landlords or bourgeoisie and I hope I can make that happen.

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why don’t you go make a socialist city builder game, then? The means of production are right there for the seizing, my friend, go learn game dev right now.

      • eltimablo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No learn, only seize

        Edit: guys I was making a joke. If you’re going to seize anything, please learn how it works first.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s communist, not socialist, but there is the fantastic Workers and Resources: Soviet Republic game made by slovakians as a criticism of the time under the soviet union.

        Colossal Order is Finnish though, so I have reasonable confidence they know socialism != communism. It’s more of an interesting twist that they let you try the orphan-crushing option.

        • Andjhostet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The distinction between socialism and communism gets a little silly imo. Some people claim that communism is a stateless society, and that countries like the Soviet Union practiced socialism, which is just a stepping stone towards communism. You seem to be implying the opposite. Either way, there’s like a million different things you could call these ideologies (state-socialism, market socialism, democratic-socialism, communism, anarcho-communism, Stalinism, etc)

          Ultimately, I just want workers to own the means of production in my city, whatever you want to call that.

        • amio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fair enough, I was just consciously avoiding “communist” because, I don’t even know. Anything is socialist in American terms and I’m just confused, it seemed like “yur commie” would be slightly too on the nose. Not that I care too much when the context is someone’s spamming game threads.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Paradox has been very welcoming of modders in CS1, I see no reason why someone wouldn’t be able to make a mod for a socialist-inspired ideology in CS2, although that would be a biggg undertaking

      • Andjhostet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, there’s probably some easy workarounds to be “good enough”. Subsidized public housing (which I think will be in base game) to ensure zero homelessness, rent control measures, being able to tax the shit out of high income earners and provide subsidies to low income earners, and free/publicly funded public services like healthcare, education, transit (which should be in the base game) and I’ll be mostly happy.

        Guillotine for billionaires would certainly be fun, but I’ll live without it. Having an economy 100% controlled by the state would be a bit too much micromanagement for me so I’m fine with business creation being driven by market needs.

      • Andjhostet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do… do you not understand that city design and political and economic ideology are inextricably linked?

  • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m interested, just don’t want to eventually spend 2k on dlc. To get the entirety of the first it’s 377$ with a 9% discount. Which is a bit insane.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if you only bought the expansions that speak to you though? I don’t need the content creator pack or the K pop radio station, but I did want Green Cities and Mass Transit, for instance.

      • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather that basics be part of the game from the start. Mass transit should have been there to begin with. Looking at a lot of these dlc it seems like they should’ve been there by default.

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So then what if you waited until it had all of the features that you consider necessary and then buy those on a sale? You’re a far cry from $2k spent in either case.

          • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I shouldn’t have to spend anything extra for basics. It should be there already. So I’ll just not pay anything and pirate it if their monetization scheme is going to be this fucked.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who determines what’s a basic and what’s expanded content then? You know what’s in it when it comes out, and you can buy it at that price or not. If they do extra work, it makes sense to sell it as an add-on. If you were happy with it before they added night clubs or weather features, were they really that essential to be included in the base package? If you weren’t happy with it before they added those things, wait until they add those things. They sell a good product at a fair price, and they’re forthcoming about what’s in it. They don’t try to keep you hooked with weird psychological tricks or gambling mechanics. Nothing about this is fucked.

    • Veraxus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be perfectly happy with Paradox’s “slew of DLC” business model… until they raised their prices.

      Before that, I would buy everything as soon as it dropped. No biggie. Now I only buy DLC when it eventually gets those deep discount sales. I’m open to their experimental “subscription” & “seasonal bundle” models, though… so long as they include everything and they don’t get cute with exclusions.

      • emmanuel_car@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please, no more subscriptions. Let me own the content I purchase, as much as anyone ever owns digital content at least.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because the DLC exists doesn’t mean you need it. I bought the original Cities Skylines, haven’t bought any DLC, but still had a great time. It looks like this time around they’ll also include more features from DLC into the base game. Evaluate the game based on what it is. Is it worth the money? Then buy it. Is it not worth the money, then don’t.

  • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like it’s going to be a pretty difficult game, if we are supposed to solve problems that aren’t even being solved in real life.

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the real-life problems aren’t unsolved because there are not solutions. It’s just that the meaningful player base is wildly toxic and spends the entire time griefing rather than trying to build or progress.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the lack of transparency in the Pay-to-win game mechanics is annoying as heck. It’s frustrating to be lectured on F2P deck building strategies by someone who is P2P and pretending to be F2P (And that’s ignoring the contradictory advice of “Break out of the meta and do something new” and “Don’t spend your resources frivolously and don’t do anything too outlandish, stick with the established strategies”).

        The P2P playerbase are functionally playing an entirely different game, and whilst I am fairly sure that game is still grindy and difficult in its own ways (I’ve noticed that P2P players are often so OP that they only engage with the co-op mechanics superficially, if at all. That makes me sad because the only reason I’ve stuck playing this game is how incredible the co-op multiplayer is and as salty as I am about P2P advantages being OP, I want everyone to experience the parts of this game that I have truly loved).

        This is why solving the real life problems stalls so much, because “progress” literally means something different across different chunks of players. It’s why griefers sometimes say “I don’t know why you’re getting angry, I’m literally just playing the game”. That used to make me rage, but I’ve realised they’re not lying, they’re just playing a different game. Now I’m just sad that I have to spend so much energy trying to keep them out of my game if I want to make any progress

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the thing is, we know how to fix them. It’s just that our governments refuse to in order to funnel taxpayer money to giant corporations.

    • UnhappyCamper@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a big reason a could never get into City Skylines, I have 0 interest in managing roadways, and I feel like that’s 90% of what that game is. Now they’re going to throw even more micromanaging on top of that, I don’t think I’ll be looking to get this one.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And many people feel the precise opposite, the whole point of the game is to micromanage

        To me this new game makes the first one feel like a prototype, i’m so much more interested now that there’s actual sensible simulation of things and people don’t pull a car out of their ass or merrily walk 30km to work

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, CS1 shows how difficult it is to build effective roads. I solved traffic on my map with an extensive, fast and direct public transit network, and well-connected bike paths along the same alignment for those who don’t want to pay. For roads specifically, timed&sensor traffic lights (TMPE mod) and one way systems in built up areas work well too from what I’ve seen.

        I am a little scared of the extra management they’ve popped in to CS2 but I’m hopeful they’ll get the balance right

  • BiggestBulb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m hoping (more than likely in vain) that we can have the opportunity to do some of the wackier stuff seen in SimCity: Societies. By that, I mean I would love to craft an authoritarian police state, a beautiful pagoda-filled village or a Disney-esque paradise town.

    SimCity: Societies was very bad in a lot of aspects (game froze all the time, roads were awful and it was massively unbalanced) but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t miss it at all when it comes to city building. I just wanna make clown schools and have a bunch of free-roaming clowns, damnit.

    • Veraxus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is Paradox we’re talking about. There will be 2,000 pieces of DLC for $10 a piece.

  • Corroded@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kind of hope they add dystopian elements. It would be an extra thing on top of my message of my sewage canals

  • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really enjoyed the first, though I was terrible at managing traffic.

    Now I can be terrible at managing traffic AND homeless!

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, my cities’ bottleneck was always getting the traffic to be able to have the hearses do their job. Somehow that’s what causes a city to stop growing, compared to other factors like the economy.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember years ago playing SimCity for the 1st time at my cousin’s house. Started playing in the evening and stopped when the birds came out and the sun came up…much to my surprise.

    I got Cities-Skylines about a year ago and I think I put less than 5 hours into it.