• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sadly, no:

    Bakers, bakeries and bakers shops were required by law only to sell their ‘national loaves’ when they were a day old because stale bread did not cut to waste like fresh bread. Source

    [If you can find it, the BBC Timeshift episode ‘Bread: A Loaf Affair’ mentions this along with a surprisingly interesting modern-ish history of bread in the UK. It’s narrated by Tom Baker.]

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bing AI gave me this: "The phrase “did not cut to waste” in the context of bread rationing during wartime refers to the idea that stale bread, being firmer and less crumbly than fresh bread, could be sliced more thinly and evenly without falling apart or producing excess crumbs. "

      • nelly_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        According to the Oxford English Dictionary, it means to cut in a wasteful manner, particularly in terms of fabric. From elsewhere, it looks like it’s also used in construction in regards to cutting material such that the remaining sections are not usable for other purposes.

        However, I’m not sure how stale bread discourages such cuts.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fresh bread tastes amazing. You overconsume by eating it by itself.

          Stale bread tastes… stale. You actually cut thin slices so you can top it with stuff that masks it.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I see where he got his sense of humour at least. I’ll try to find that, thanks.