• FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see the issue in using a controller, the US Navy does the same

      I do. I’ve been an avid PC Gamer my entire adult life and I’ve never had a Logitech product that wasn’t terribly glitchy. When I heard that bit it made me feel like Moss in The IT Crowd.

      • Suppoze@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did you use this specific controller? It is actually a beast, very high quality and durable. I’ve used a Logitech Rumblepad 2for almost a decade. The only issue I had with it is that it did not support xinput, only direct input, so a lot of games do not support it anymore. But still works like a charm.

        However I won’t trust my life on it.

      • fades@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The difference is they collab with the military to make actual quality shit. Their consumer products are just a side-gig!

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Logitech used to make good controllers - dunno how they are now. But they shouldn’t have used a bluetooth one. But they did have a backup controller also. And probably didn’t plan on getting close to any obstacles they could collide with.

        Imo it’s the least problematic part of the whole setup.

    • terrrmus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Using a controller is fine, but I’m sure they are hardwired. There is a Today show interview where the CEO specifically said they use them over bluetooth.

      Absolutely all shit made up in my brain from my hatred of bluetooth. I could definitely see the controller dying because they forgot to charge it, tried to connect the spare but bluetooth being bluetooth wouldn’t. Then they drift into the Titantic, get a puncture and implode.

      • Thrashy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Vivid imagery befitting the general reliability of Bluetooth (witness me covering one of my EarPods to get the other one to connect up and sync with my phone at least once a day) but putting all the pieces together, my best guess is that the pressure vessel split at one of the seams between the cylindrical carbon fiber center section due to fatigue at the joint, well above their target depth. There’s a reason why every other DSV designed to reach those depths uses a single-piece spherical pressure vessel.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I keep people saying the porthole window was only rated for ~1300 meter dives, though I haven’t seen the source for this yet.

          Also fiberglass as a material and the way they were cheaping out on checking it for imperfections.

          But yeah also the join. It seems so obviously a horrible idea.

      • sanols@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahhhh now that’s insane, there’s no good reason for that to be wireless at all…

    • patchymoose@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that it’s a wireless controller is what I really don’t understand. Why would you want to risk interference, battery issues, etc?

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s because they said they’d pass it to the passengers to let them control it. Easier to hand around. Maybe? Which would still be dumb because it introduces risks and they could just swap seats instead.

    • Cybrpwca@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The big difference I see is what it’s controlling. Sure, the Navy used Xbox controllers for intuitive use of the periscope. I bet if you asked them “please make all ship attitude controls, and therefore crew safety, reliant on this,” they would laugh at you and walk away.

    • Enfield [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have to admit that a game controller, at least the ergonomics and controls of one, likely makes more sense than it would seem at first blush.

      I think it’s more a problem with circumstances and optics. If all was well and this whole fiasco didn’t happen, I could see it being framed as a sort of goofy trivia piece, just like the US Navy’s use. But when things go wrong as they did here, it feels like the kind of bit that’s incredibly easy to reach and dunk on.

      I’m not inclined to hinge my disappointment on the game controller, but I can’t blame anyone for doing that, either.

    • MyNameIsFred@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah. There was a show years ago called Bomb Patrol: Afghanistan where EOD techs were on deployment detonating roadside bombs. The robot they used was controlled by an Xbox controller and the guy best at the job was their youngest team member because….video games