• idle@158436977.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really sure how well bikes would work where I live. The winters are harsh, and its steep hill after steep hill.

      • GraceGH@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        e-biking RULES. You don’t even have to pedal if you don’t want to, the throttle works just fine (although it eats your battery life if you don’t augment it with pedaling)

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A valid concern. Bikes are good for fair weather and close proximity. Not all of the world is set up for this. Trains and busses have been around for a long time and can help reduce emissions and work in bad weather. Trains could require costly new infrastructure but busses can use existing roadways. The big goal should be to move away from cars. Ten people on a bus use less emissions then 10 cars on thier own.

      • Juniper@skein.city
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Out of curiosity, could you clarify “close proximity”? Because I certainly agree a bike is not viable if you are in the countryside. However having switched to bicycling and no longer driving my car recently, it has shrunk the world around me far more than driving ever has.

        • kool_newt@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you expand on that? What do you mean bicycling shrunk the world, it seems counterintuitive?

          • Juniper@skein.city
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Understandably so, I think haha. But for me, abandoning my car has made me actually realize distances in my city. Relying on a car, I barely even considered the distances I was traveling, and how necessary or not they were. I was more concerned about where I could park the thing than how far I was traveling just to do errands. But on a bicycle (and just walking), the first thing I do is consider the route, and distance, and I came to realize a lot of the distances I thought are best driven are… extremely walkable, or bikeable. And the distances that are a little far for a bicycle (in my current shape), I questioned why I even need to go that far. Especially if you’re in a city, there are a ton of businesses everywhere, it was easy to look for and find closer alternatives.

            So I guess for me personally, it really helped me contextualize the distances I was actually traveling, and helped me more concretely view my city and what’s around me, compared to just driving through liminal spaces until I reach whichever destination I was headed towards.

            • kool_newt@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, it’s like it allowed you to view where you lived at a new scale. You previously viewed it at car scale, now viewing it at human scale.

              • Juniper@skein.city
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Absolutely, that is a far more eloquent way to put it! It’s very freeing in it’s own way.