anon6789@lemmy.world to Superbowl@lemmy.world · 5 months agoKnock Knocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1337arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1335arrow-down1imageKnock Knocklemmy.worldanon6789@lemmy.world to Superbowl@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejohannesvanderwhales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·5 months agoAnd for people who think they should’ve been called red-headed woodpeckers, the name was taken.
minus-squareanon6789@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months agoThe original does have more red so it’s deserved at least
minus-squarefederalreverse-old@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoWhy not go for “redneck woodpecker” though? Granted, it does look a bit too elegant for that name.
And for people who think they should’ve been called red-headed woodpeckers, the name was taken.
The original does have more red so it’s deserved at least
Why not go for “redneck woodpecker” though? Granted, it does look a bit too elegant for that name.